reserving the right to object, it is my understanding that this substitute would require the Federal Government to go to court in order to stop someone on the terrorist watch list from purchasing a weapon. As a default, we should all agree that if you are on the terrorist watch list, you can't walk out of a gun store with a gun and that it simply shouldn't be incumbent on the Federal Government to go through a court process in order to stop you from doing that. If you shouldn't be on the list, there are ways you can get off the list. But there is absolutely no reason to delay the process of stopping one of these would-be terrorists from getting a gun by requiring a complicated court process every time someone on the terrorist watch list walks into a gun store. For that reason, Mr. President, I object to the motion to modify. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The majority whip.
Share
More from Chris Murphy
The firm appears to have little relevant experience with the legal and practical challenges that children face, raising serious concerns about the firm’s ability to provide not just representation but adequate, zealous representation.
The reason that this war is dragging on endlessly – it does matter, and my colleagues should care about Trump's insider trading subscription scheme.
Children deserve competent representation by attorneys who practice at the intersection of child welfare and federal immigration law, but Americans also deserve to know why their federal dollars are being doled out to Trump’s friends and…
Yes, I will support a deal to end this war and reopen the strait. I am prepared to support a bad deal to end this war and reopen the strait because the only deal that is available at this point in time is a terrible bad deal.





