It is intriguing to me to listen to this discussion for a variety of reasons because, regardless of whether or not anyone believes that our efforts in Iraq are right and honorable and good, I have yet to meet anyone who believes that the need to defend the homeland from terrorist attack is not greater than it has ever been. One may disagree entirely with whether the decisions made by the President have been appropriate; but no one says, no one has dared to say that we should do anything but aggressively pursue policies that are designed to make us more secure from terrorists who we know are out there, whether or not they conspired with the Iraqi Government, with Saddam Hussein, or whether or not our efforts in Iraq will lessen that particular threat. The reality is we know we have a threat and we know that we should be doing everything possible to, in fact, defend ourselves against that threat.
Tom Tancredo: “It is intriguing to me to listen to this discussion for a variety of reasons because, regardless of whether or not…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing homeland security and the need to defend against terrorist attacks during a debate.
Share
More from Tom Tancredo
We are testing our willingness to actually hold on to something called the English language, something that is the glue that is supposed to hold us together as a nation.
Look at the attack on our own culture that is occurring as a result of massive immigration, illegal immigration in particular.
If this happens in the United States and we determined that it is the result of extremist fundamentalist Muslims, you know, you could take out their holy sites.
This is the kind of situation where somebody like me, somebody who does not have hundreds of millions of dollars of personal wealth, can still make a difference, because you can still get to every little cafe.





