Mr. Chairman, I guess I am here to speak for the cultural iconoclasts of the Congress and of the Nation who are concerned about the fact that the gentleman from Connecticut who just spoke is correct in that he says this is a statement, a statement that the government has a role to play in the funding of the arts. This is the ultimate sort of decision we must make here and we will, of course, after a certain period of time as to exactly why it is the Federal Government's role to participate in this. It is not for me to suggest that any of the things that the National Endowment for the Arts or Humanities does with the money is inappropriate. I am sure that in 2003, the New York Foundation for the Arts to support a fine-cut edit of Check Your Body At the Door, a video documentary about popular, social and club dancers in New York City; or, say, the Orange Show Foundation in Houston, Texas, to support conservation and restoration of the Beer Can House, a work by self-taught artist John Milkovisch.
Tom Tancredo: “Mr. Chairman, I guess I am here to speak for the cultural iconoclasts of the Congress and of the Nation who are…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the role of the federal government in funding the arts.
Share
More from Tom Tancredo
Look at the attack on our own culture that is occurring as a result of massive immigration, illegal immigration in particular.
I would be in favor of accepting those that can be actually identified as coming here under humanitarian conditions and as refugees.
We are testing our willingness to actually hold on to something called the English language, something that is the glue that is supposed to hold us together as a nation.
At the present time, it is not. But if we pass this amendment, it would be, yes. There has to be some sort of penalty assessed to the law that is already on the books or, of course, it is of no value. That is why so many cities have…





