I am simply asking people on the floor of the House and this body to establish a priority here. What is more important? Is it, in fact, the preservation of our forests? Is it to try to mitigate against the catastrophic fires that we have been experiencing and that we will continue to experience because of the overloaded conditions in the forests? Is that more important than purchasing $50 million worth of art? The gentleman and I both know I think it is patently clear that, regardless of whether or not the Federal Government ever bought a piece of art or funded a particular artist, art would thrive in America. People would paint. People would do everything that they have been doing, regardless of whether or not the Federal Government chose to participate in that particular endeavor. So, again, I am just asking that the House establish a priority here.
Tom Tancredo: “I am simply asking people on the floor of the House and this body to establish a priority here. What is more important?…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing funding priorities between forest preservation and art purchases.
Share
More from Tom Tancredo
CBS News recently ran an expose on the growing phenomenon of illegal aliens entering the United States in order to give birth to a child. The segment shed some light on what has become an increasingly costly burden to the United States…
At the present time, it is not. But if we pass this amendment, it would be, yes. There has to be some sort of penalty assessed to the law that is already on the books or, of course, it is of no value. That is why so many cities have…
my amendment simply suspends the Visa Waiver Program for fiscal year 2008. The Visa Waiver Program was established in 1986 as a temporary, and I underline temporary, program to allow tourists or short-term business visitors to enter the…
I have to ask you a question, and the question is, how are you going to convince America that you have, in fact, changed your mind on the issues immigration from when you were governor?





