On the recordNovember 14, 2011
It seems to me that the proposed rule that you have put forward is in direct conflict with Colorado water law, congressional intent and private property rights.
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Tipton criticizes a proposed rule affecting water rights in Colorado.
Share
More from Scott Tipton
Feb 12, 2020
I would like to thank my colleague, Mr. Cunningham, for putting forward this amendment. I do rise in opposition, though I am not opposed, ultimately, to the amendment. I am glad to join my colleague from South Carolina as a cosponsor…
Oct 30, 2019
I appreciate the opportunity to address the Colorado Outdoor Recreation and Economy Act on the floor. We want to be able to ensure that the land being transferred from the Forest Service to the National Park Service management comply with…
Oct 30, 2019
I demand a recorded vote. The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Colorado will be postponed. Amendment No. 6 Offered by Mr. Crow The Acting CHAIR. It is now…
Other voices in this conversation
