On the recordJuly 29, 2014
The basic content of the letter is objecting to the insufficient analysis offered by the EPA on the impacts that this rule will have.
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Tipton criticizes the EPA's analysis on the impacts of a new rule.
Share
More from Scott Tipton
Jan 28, 2020
I am a little dismayed with some of the comments that have been made here today.
Oct 31, 2019
Yes, in its current form. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman qualifies. The Clerk will report the motion to recommit. The Clerk read as follows: Mr. Tipton moves to recommit the bill H.R. 823 to the Committee on Natural Resources with…
Jan 28, 2020
We would like, Madam Chairwoman, to be able to introduce that into the record with unanimous consent.
Feb 12, 2020
I do rise in opposition to the amendment before us. Apparently, the bill that is before us today didn't include enough wilderness in my district. As we see in this amendment, we are now trying to be able to add more. The amendment adds an…
Other voices in this conversation
