I came to talk about what the gentleman from California, Mr. George Miller, and I did yesterday. Mr. Miller and I were both Chairs of the Select Committee on Children, Youth, and Families. That select committee is now gone. It has been put away. But when the Select Committee on Children, Youth, and Families was alive, it was a vigorous watchdog for children and for family votes. Yesterday the gentleman from California [Mr. Miller] and I decided that in the spirit of what is happening this weekend in Washington, with tens of thousands of people coming to Washington tomorrow for the Stand for Children Rally, that we would look at the votes of the 104th Congress and rank the top 10 that would help children. Yesterday we released our report. We called it, ``Who's for Kids and Who's Just Kidding?'' The reason that we emphasized that is no Member of Congress has ever gotten elected saying they hate kids, and yet when you look at the votes, it comes out very differently. That is partly because we do not have a watchdog here anymore on these different votes pointing out the difference, and so people can kind of plaster over their votes with wonderful photo ops, with warm, fuzzy children and puppy dogs, and they can also give great speeches and rhetoric on family values, and then vote the other way when no one is looking.
Patricia Schroeder: “I came to talk about what the gentleman from California, Mr. George Miller, and I did yesterday. Mr. Miller and I were…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the release of a report ranking congressional votes affecting children.
Share
More from Patricia Schroeder
I clearly rise in support of this bill, and I really want to thank the chairman of the subcommittee, Carlos Moorhead, from California, who has done such a wonderful job to move this bill in the very short period of time we have left. We…
I guess the question is, how long does it take for a reasonable investigation? Our problem is 2 years seems like a very long time. In the past, and we can bring those charts to the floor except they probably would be ruled out of order…
here are six reasons to vote against the fiscal year 1997 DOD authorization conference report: First, the measure provides: $11.3 billion more than the Pentagon requested overall, $7 billion more than requested for procurement, $3.8…
as we go into any election, one of the hardest things is to figure out where the candidates really stand on issues. And when we go into any third-grade class in America and we ask the 8-year-olds, ``Okay, what is the best predictor of what…





