Let me ask a few questions about your amendment, because I really think this amendment goes much further than the bill, if I am reading it correctly. The way I read the sanctions section on page 2 is that you oppose the sanction on the verifier of the complaint and the attorney of record, and it says 'shall.' So my understanding is you are putting them both in the loop for a frivolous lawsuit; is that correct? ... I do trust to the trial judge to enter an appropriate order of sanctions potentially on the party and the party's attorney.
Patricia Schroeder: “Let me ask a few questions about your amendment, because I really think this amendment goes much further than the bill…”
Editor's note · Context
Questioning an amendment related to sanctions in a legislative bill.
Share
More from Patricia Schroeder
But that ``it'' cost a half a million dollars and we cannot see it. This morning's Washington Post has a clarification of what the Speaker said about the ``it'' in it. And I hope that everybody reads it, because while the Speaker said one…
Today free speech has been frozen on the House floor. I never thought I could live to see that day. We have now had a ruling today that newspapers can discuss these issues, editorial boards can discuss these issues, but the Members of this…
I just wanted to respond that in the Wright case it took 2 weeks to get a special counsel, and in the Gingrich case we talked about 15 months. I think there is a great difference. Thank you.
I find that fairly astonishing, that they tell us we can go outside and talk about it, but we cannot talk about it on the floor.





