Let me ask a few questions about your amendment, because I really think this amendment goes much further than the bill, if I am reading it correctly. The way I read the sanctions section on page 2 is that you oppose the sanction on the verifier of the complaint and the attorney of record, and it says 'shall.' So my understanding is you are putting them both in the loop for a frivolous lawsuit; is that correct? ... I do trust to the trial judge to enter an appropriate order of sanctions potentially on the party and the party's attorney.
Patricia Schroeder: “Let me ask a few questions about your amendment, because I really think this amendment goes much further than the bill…”
Editor's note · Context
Questioning an amendment related to sanctions in a legislative bill.
Share
More from Patricia Schroeder
I have always thought it was a shame that we had not done more on energy independence so we did not have to be in the Gulf anyway. One of the problems we have is we are not defending great democracies. I have been very upset about how the…
You show me an American woman who tells you that rape is not a serious bodily injury, I want to see that person come forward. I think it is shocking that we would have males sitting on the court of appeals that would say that…
I find that fairly astonishing, that they tell us we can go outside and talk about it, but we cannot talk about it on the floor.
I rise in support of the Schiff-Schumer amendment. Good technology is an important key to a successful counterterrorism policy. Look at how the Wall Street Journal characterized our antiterrorism effort in their headlines yesterday…





