Absolutely. If we had that kind of disclosure, I think we would have much less in the line of October surprises when this passes because we will know exactly how it is going to look. It is going to look like something they favor. If they paid the fiddler, they are calling the tune. And apparently they paid the fiddler, and apparently they are calling the tune, so let us get the facts out. I think the gentleman from Texas once again has done an eloquent job.
Patricia Schroeder: “Absolutely. If we had that kind of disclosure, I think we would have much less in the line of October surprises when…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need for transparency in legislation to avoid surprises.
Share
More from Patricia Schroeder
I was very troubled by the Chair's ruling, and I am going to tell my colleagues why. My understanding is, what we are debating is the martial law rule which gives the Speaker the right to bring any resolution to the floor whenever he wants…
But that ``it'' cost a half a million dollars and we cannot see it. This morning's Washington Post has a clarification of what the Speaker said about the ``it'' in it. And I hope that everybody reads it, because while the Speaker said one…
today the New York Times lead editorial talks about this House and its stalling on ethics. This is shameful. The New York Times points out that the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct is supposed to meet today, and it goes on to…
I wanted this body to hear what the gentlewoman said because that has been our position all along. We do not wish to hurt good mothers. That was the President's position. That is still our position. I was the one who went to the Committee…





