Absolutely. If we had that kind of disclosure, I think we would have much less in the line of October surprises when this passes because we will know exactly how it is going to look. It is going to look like something they favor. If they paid the fiddler, they are calling the tune. And apparently they paid the fiddler, and apparently they are calling the tune, so let us get the facts out. I think the gentleman from Texas once again has done an eloquent job.
Patricia Schroeder: “Absolutely. If we had that kind of disclosure, I think we would have much less in the line of October surprises when…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need for transparency in legislation to avoid surprises.
Share
More from Patricia Schroeder
I wanted to inquire about the suffragettes who are still in the basement of the rotunda, who have been down there since 1921. I understand that the funding has now been procured privately to raise them up to the first, to the main floor…
I was concerned about the words ``shameless demagoguery.'' I think those are words we could have taken down, and I do not really want to do that. But I think that is a very strong word.
I was really pleased to hear the Speaker say he did not have an objection to it, and was wondering, since it appears to have been cleared and so noncontroversial, could we get it out and could we get it passed?
I find that fairly astonishing, that they tell us we can go outside and talk about it, but we cannot talk about it on the floor.





