It is right at your front door. But I think you are absolutely correct, with the water at your front door, for which there would be a great temptation to say yes, the feds should pay for this and cut any program that there is, you are pointing out if we put cut these feeding programs, we are going to have a much bigger national disaster coming down the road. And it is not fair for the Governor to have it both ways. He can give back State taxes and then we are forced here to send our Federal taxes to him.
Patricia Schroeder: “It is right at your front door. But I think you are absolutely correct, with the water at your front door, for which…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of federal disaster relief and state tax policies.
Share
More from Patricia Schroeder
I wanted this body to hear what the gentlewoman said because that has been our position all along. We do not wish to hurt good mothers. That was the President's position. That is still our position. I was the one who went to the Committee…
today the New York Times lead editorial talks about this House and its stalling on ethics. This is shameful. The New York Times points out that the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct is supposed to meet today, and it goes on to…
I was concerned about the words ``shameless demagoguery.'' I think those are words we could have taken down, and I do not really want to do that. But I think that is a very strong word.
This amendment is about burdensharing. It is a very key amendment, because it basically only asks that when the President engages in the rest of the reporting requirements, that they also report to the Congress what percentage of the…





