I do not quite understand. You can have a lawful arrest and then defend yourself. But it would be a reasonably lawful arrest, and then the person could present what was really happening. It is not like you can only arrest a person unless it is 100 percent proof in court, and under a lawful arrest, you are allowed to do a lawful search.
Discussing the implications of lawful arrests and self-defense.
Share
More from Patricia Schroeder
I find that fairly astonishing, that they tell us we can go outside and talk about it, but we cannot talk about it on the floor.
But that ``it'' cost a half a million dollars and we cannot see it. This morning's Washington Post has a clarification of what the Speaker said about the ``it'' in it. And I hope that everybody reads it, because while the Speaker said one…
I rise in support of the Schiff-Schumer amendment. Good technology is an important key to a successful counterterrorism policy. Look at how the Wall Street Journal characterized our antiterrorism effort in their headlines yesterday…
I guess the question is, how long does it take for a reasonable investigation? Our problem is 2 years seems like a very long time. In the past, and we can bring those charts to the floor except they probably would be ruled out of order…
Other voices in this conversation
