I think if we go this entirely opposite way so we suddenly start paying people not to farm and not having the means test instead of doing the absolute reverse of it, when consumers figure this out, they are going to think we are absolutely nuts. So certainly if we are going to have a farm program, let us have one that encourages farming, that rewards hard work, that fits with the American concept of what we are supposed to be doing, rather than one that looks more like a welfare program for the biggest landowners such as the Sam Donaldsons, who can decide what they want to do. It makes no difference. They get paid anyway. That makes no sense to me and I do not think it is going to make sense to anybody else who is out doing their grocery shopping and paying their taxes.
Patricia Schroeder: “I think if we go this entirely opposite way so we suddenly start paying people not to farm and not having the means test…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need for reform in farm programs during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Patricia Schroeder
I was very troubled by the Chair's ruling, and I am going to tell my colleagues why. My understanding is, what we are debating is the martial law rule which gives the Speaker the right to bring any resolution to the floor whenever he wants…
today our prayer was about doing justice and loving mercy and today our legislative agenda is about descending these steps collecting more and more money from special interest groups. We have failed at campaign finance reform and we have…
I just wanted to respond that in the Wright case it took 2 weeks to get a special counsel, and in the Gingrich case we talked about 15 months. I think there is a great difference. Thank you.
I guess the question is, how long does it take for a reasonable investigation? Our problem is 2 years seems like a very long time. In the past, and we can bring those charts to the floor except they probably would be ruled out of order…





