I think if we go this entirely opposite way so we suddenly start paying people not to farm and not having the means test instead of doing the absolute reverse of it, when consumers figure this out, they are going to think we are absolutely nuts. So certainly if we are going to have a farm program, let us have one that encourages farming, that rewards hard work, that fits with the American concept of what we are supposed to be doing, rather than one that looks more like a welfare program for the biggest landowners such as the Sam Donaldsons, who can decide what they want to do. It makes no difference. They get paid anyway. That makes no sense to me and I do not think it is going to make sense to anybody else who is out doing their grocery shopping and paying their taxes.
Patricia Schroeder: “I think if we go this entirely opposite way so we suddenly start paying people not to farm and not having the means test…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need for reform in farm programs during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Patricia Schroeder
But that ``it'' cost a half a million dollars and we cannot see it. This morning's Washington Post has a clarification of what the Speaker said about the ``it'' in it. And I hope that everybody reads it, because while the Speaker said one…
I thought the gentleman from Georgia [Mr. Lewis] made a very emotional and correct approach. There comes a time when we all must stand up and say, what are these rules for? Are they to keep the American people from learning the truth? I am…
I find that fairly astonishing, that they tell us we can go outside and talk about it, but we cannot talk about it on the floor.
I find it amazing that we cannot come to this House floor and discuss the chief officer of this House and different violations that have been alleged of this chief officer that has put a cloud over this House. I find that astounding. I…





