Mr. Chairman, this is very historic, in that it is the first time this body will speak out and say that our government should recognize female genital mutilation as a major health risk to women and a major human rights violation, and we also should do everything we can to make sure that countries do not allow this practice to continue. This was important. I had wanted to target this to Egypt, since we give so much aid to Egypt and since this practice is so rampant there, and especially since their government has recently tried to medicalize it rather than condemn it. This is a more generic form, but I approve it, and I think very much all of my colleagues who worked very hard to take this very, very important step of saying violations against women are also human rights violations and not just cultural violations. There has never been any religious reason for this. There has never been any reason except cultural, and we are making a great progressive step today.
Patricia Schroeder: “Mr. Chairman, this is very historic, in that it is the first time this body will speak out and say that our government…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the recognition of female genital mutilation as a health risk and human rights violation.
Share
More from Patricia Schroeder
I find it amazing that we cannot come to this House floor and discuss the chief officer of this House and different violations that have been alleged of this chief officer that has put a cloud over this House. I find that astounding. I…
Mr. Chairman, how sad I am that now for the third time we have seen Members on this floor denying the gentlewoman from the District of Columbia the right to offer her amendment. I think this Gingrich Congress is going to go down as one of…
today our prayer was about doing justice and loving mercy and today our legislative agenda is about descending these steps collecting more and more money from special interest groups. We have failed at campaign finance reform and we have…
I guess the question is, how long does it take for a reasonable investigation? Our problem is 2 years seems like a very long time. In the past, and we can bring those charts to the floor except they probably would be ruled out of order…





