That is right. And when you look at the economic damages, they always weigh in a whole lot more. The noneconomic damages, and without the punitive add-on to it, and the joint and several, I really think women or men, for that matter, I think we are going to learn more and more about men losing their reproductive capacity. We do not know why, but we are starting to see more articles about this new disturbing trend.
Patricia Schroeder: “That is right. And when you look at the economic damages, they always weigh in a whole lot more. The noneconomic…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing economic and noneconomic damages related to reproductive health.
Share
More from Patricia Schroeder
I was really pleased to hear the Speaker say he did not have an objection to it, and was wondering, since it appears to have been cleared and so noncontroversial, could we get it out and could we get it passed?
I find that fairly astonishing, that they tell us we can go outside and talk about it, but we cannot talk about it on the floor.
Today free speech has been frozen on the House floor. I never thought I could live to see that day. We have now had a ruling today that newspapers can discuss these issues, editorial boards can discuss these issues, but the Members of this…
But that ``it'' cost a half a million dollars and we cannot see it. This morning's Washington Post has a clarification of what the Speaker said about the ``it'' in it. And I hope that everybody reads it, because while the Speaker said one…





