I just want to say to people who continue to think it is real cute to object to her being able to bring this up: This is wrong. This is how women in this body are treated by the other Members. We are not equal. You would not do this to male colleagues, and you bloody well know it, and you would not do it to issues that dealt with male citizens, and you bloody well know it. I think it is really very sad that you think it is so cute to continue to object when you have now done it three times, three times, to the gentlewoman, and she now has stated she was here, and you continue to roll over her. I do not know what else we can do. We wear bright colors. We hope you can see us. We know there are not many of us. But this is, indeed, a very sad night.
Patricia Schroeder: “I just want to say to people who continue to think it is real cute to object to her being able to bring this up: This is…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the treatment of women in Congress during a floor debate.
Share
More from Patricia Schroeder
I was concerned about the words ``shameless demagoguery.'' I think those are words we could have taken down, and I do not really want to do that. But I think that is a very strong word.
I wanted to inquire about the suffragettes who are still in the basement of the rotunda, who have been down there since 1921. I understand that the funding has now been procured privately to raise them up to the first, to the main floor…
I just wanted to respond that in the Wright case it took 2 weeks to get a special counsel, and in the Gingrich case we talked about 15 months. I think there is a great difference. Thank you.
But that ``it'' cost a half a million dollars and we cannot see it. This morning's Washington Post has a clarification of what the Speaker said about the ``it'' in it. And I hope that everybody reads it, because while the Speaker said one…





