Mr. Speaker, Newt Gingrich wants to move America back, back to the fifties--back to the 1850's. Earlier this week, the Speaker announced that America needs to be more like Victorian England, whose heyday was in the mid-1800's. I have a difficult time believing that the Speaker wants to take us back to another age, much less another country--the one we waged our revolution against. But it is more difficult for me to believe that the Speaker, who prides himself on being a futurist, who claims to be a surfer of the third wave of information, who by his own admission was a free thinker of the sixties, and continues to use the tactics and language of the sixties, actually prefers to reinvent Victorian England here in America. As Dickens spoke of that age in his opening paragraph of ``A Tale of Two Cities'' in 1859: It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epic of incredulity, it was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair, we had everything before us, we had nothing before us. The Victorian Age was great for the privileged few and awful for just as many.
Patricia Schroeder: “Mr. Speaker, Newt Gingrich wants to move America back, back to the fifties--back to the 1850's. Earlier this week, the…”
Editor's note · Context
Criticizing Newt Gingrich's vision for America during a floor speech.
Share
More from Patricia Schroeder
Mr. Chairman, how sad I am that now for the third time we have seen Members on this floor denying the gentlewoman from the District of Columbia the right to offer her amendment. I think this Gingrich Congress is going to go down as one of…
I am absolutely delighted with Newsweek because you know what it says? Here we have this wonderful picture of Shannon Lucid and it said: Forget the fighter jocks. At 53 years of age, Shannon Lucid has the new right stuff. To be in space…
I was really pleased to hear the Speaker say he did not have an objection to it, and was wondering, since it appears to have been cleared and so noncontroversial, could we get it out and could we get it passed?
I guess the question is, how long does it take for a reasonable investigation? Our problem is 2 years seems like a very long time. In the past, and we can bring those charts to the floor except they probably would be ruled out of order…





