I think the chairman has, with his perfecting amendment, admitted that the administration had perhaps gone a road too far with their proposal, and what the chairman proposes would protect some of the most precious of our public lands against obscure, specious claims of right-of-way access. Unfortunately, the chairman's amendment does not, in my opinion, go quite far enough. Among the things that the chairman excludes from protection are private lands. And I would refer to the Salt Lake Tribune, on Saturday, June 21, 2003, which is an article about a couple, Jana and Ron Smith who, despite having researched and properly purchased their property, found that when they returned at one point from a vacation, that the local district attorney and the road crews had cut a chain, removed a gate, pulled down the private property signs, and provided full access to their very obscure and remote property which they had bought for those values. Unfortunately, they ultimately had to resort to the courts and the courts upheld their rights to the private property.
Mark Udall: “I think the chairman has, with his perfecting amendment, admitted that the administration had perhaps gone a road too…”
On the recordJuly 17, 2003
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the limitations of an amendment regarding public and private land protections.
Share
More from Mark Udall
Jul 15, 2014
General Shelton, is it fair to say that the second phase, the so-called phase 1A of the Air Force acquisition strategy, that both the new entrant and the incumbent launch provider were equally hurt in the decision to reduce the number of…
Dec 12, 2014
it is humbling to stand here to speak one final time with my colleagues as a United States Senator. As a lifelong mountain climber, I have learned far more from the mountains I did not summit, than those I did. Every climb, I have found…
Jul 28, 2014
We are grateful to Senators Udall and Barrasso as well as the bipartisan co-sponsors of S. 2440.





