normally, a proposal to turn over parkland free of charge would raise serious concerns, particularly when the proposal would also allow the new owner to sell off some of the land. However, in this instance, we are convinced that Beaver County must have a revenue stream if they are to continue operating this local park. This is compromise legislation that will allow the county to sell some acreage in order to maintain the remainder as public open space. Mr. Speaker, we do not oppose Senate bill 52.
Mark Udall: “normally, a proposal to turn over parkland free of charge would raise serious concerns, particularly when the proposal…”
Share
More from Mark Udall
The royalties paid by coal companies--and energy development of all kinds on federal lands--provide critical support for local schools, roads and other services that Colorado families count on.
today is a historic day, as Senator Wyden made clear, Senator Feinstein, Senator Rockefeller, and many other Senators to follow. Before I talk about my involvement in the efforts that were put forth to reach this day, I want to say to…
How can we now start supplying natural gas to Europe instead of the dependence upon the Putin regime?
I have come to the floor every day this week to talk about my commonsense bill to keep corporate interference out of women's private health decisions. On Monday when I was on the floor, I shared the concerns of a Denver- based OB/GYN who…





