The Endangered Species Act is no longer used as a shield. It is now used as a sword, yet we don't authorize it. We don't hold hearings, and we don't examine the impact of the Endangered Species Act. Parts of it undoubtedly are good, but a large part of it is a program that needs to either be cut, amended, or certainly examined. Mr. Speaker, I invite our good friend from Virginia, who has a wealth of information for Americans, to join us and tell us what he knows. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from Virginia (Mr. Good).
Ken Buck: “The Endangered Species Act is no longer used as a shield. It is now used as a sword, yet we don't authorize it. We don't…”
Share
More from Ken Buck
I would think that the RNC could find someone who isn't a criminal defendant who could make sure that there is election integrity in the next election.
Well, I think it's part of President Trump's theater or certainly his style, to make a lot of bold claims. And then some of them he will act on, and some of them he will back off of.
It is. There's a lot of issues that president Trump is involved in that I would argue aren't part of the mandate that he was given. Immigration is absolutely clearly part of the mandate that he was given. He has to do it in a legal way…
I think that President Biden wouldn't do anything until after the appeals are finished, number one, and that's going to happen after the election. So he's going to have much more flexibility after the election whether he wins or loses to…





