the liberals tell us that we should trust our national security to a piece of paper: the ABM treaty. It is a treaty with a country that no longer exists. The liberals are convinced that America will be safe with this piece of paper, but what will they say when a missile attack occurs when a rogue Nation or a group of dangerous terrorists threaten our Nation with a missile attack? Then what will they say? Will they continue to point to this piece of paper and say, but we have a treaty. Mr. Speaker, Iran does not care that we signed a treaty. Saddam Hussein does not care that we signed a treaty. Osama bin Laden and all of his many sympathizers across the globe certainly do not care. I ask the other side again, just what will you do when we discover to our peril that a piece of paper will not protect America from a ballistic missile attack? Men of prudence, on the other hand, look to the construction of a national missile defense system to protect America from a ballistic missile attack. It is time to act now.
John Chenoweth: “the liberals tell us that we should trust our national security to a piece of paper: the ABM treaty. It is a treaty with…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing national security and the inadequacy of the ABM treaty.
Share
More from John Chenoweth
H.R. 1021, introduced by the gentleman from Colorado (Mr. Scott McInnis), authorizes an exchange of approximately 84 acres within the Routt National Forest for approximately 84 acres of private land known as the Miles parcel, which is…
Mr. Speaker, H.R. 1659, introduced by the gentlewoman from Washington (Mrs. Smith) directs the Secretary of the Interior to fulfill a 1982 statutory requirement that the Federal Government acquire private lands and minerals within the…
Ranching on lands that are managed by the Federal Government is very different than ranching on lands that are managed by the State government. In fact, I would like to remind the gentleman from Minnesota [Mr. Vento] and the gentleman from…
Mr. Chairman, one of the oldest tactics of argument is the shotgun approach. In debate, they bombard their opposition with a flurry of arguments in the hopes that somewhere along the line one of their points will ring true. In football, an…





