Once again, I want to reiterate that this bill does not cost $50 million, does not cost $40 million, does not cost $30 million, and does not cost one penny. It's simply an authorization. And as my colleague knows in the scene he has gone through, it is just simply part of the process. If there ever is an appropriation--and there are a number of avenues under which there might not even be an appropriation. There could be a donation of the property. There could be other involvement from other sources. If there is an appropriation, that's when this would be debated. That would be part of a bill, and somebody could offer an amendment that would come before the Rules Committee. And I would certainly support ruling that in order to make sure that that is a topic that this body has the time to discuss. But now is not the debate with regard to the expenditure of any Federal dollars with regard to this matter.
On the recordJanuary 27, 2010
Editor's note · Context
The speaker is clarifying the financial implications of a bill under discussion.
Share
More from Jared Polis
Jun 14, 2026
People shouldn’t be ripped off by those falsely claiming that they can change who you are attracted to or who you are.
Jun 4, 2026
This bill doesn’t apply to any other context besides civil immigration enforcement — including rights violations in protests, elections, prisons, or the workplace.
Aug 1, 2026
An education focus that’s important but often goes underrated is recognizing that learning doesn’t end at 3 p.m.
Jun 14, 2026
In the wake of (last year’s) veto and the substantial negotiations that preceded it, I would have hoped that both business and labor leaders could have worked to craft a long-term and durable agreement on this matter that would have served…





