Political Quotes

On the recordApril 13, 2011
I would be happy to discuss this on the gentleman's own time. I want to go through this excellent chart. If the gentleman wants to come over, he can look at what we have here and what the Democrats have presented. If we were serious about deficit reduction, Republicans could have supported several amendments offered by Democrats and voted on in the House when we debated H.R. 1. The Democratic amendments alone would have cut spending by nearly $129 billion, more than three times the amount that's even claimed in this bill. Here are some examples: Congressman Stark and Congresswoman Lee offered one amendment that would have reduced defense spending to its level 3 years ago--we were already in two wars at that time as well-- saving $36 billion in the first year alone, and that would have left intact the defense budget of $688 billion, more than enough to meet the security needs of our Nation. Congressman Nadler offered an amendment that would have finally ended our support for the war in Afghanistan, saving $90 billion. Congresswoman Woolsey offered an amendment that would have saved $415 million by ending the V-22 Osprey program. In fact, just yesterday in Rules, I also proposed an amendment that would have reduced our troop presence in Europe, which would have saved $415 million. Our European allies, Madam Speaker, are some of the richest countries in the world. It's time they paid their fair way. What is the strategic rationale for an ongoing presence in Germany?…
Said by
Jared Polis
Democratic · Colorado
Source
govinfo.gov
Apr 13, 2011

Share

More from Jared Polis

May 21, 2026

By working together, we can really take a closer look and leap forward on capitalizing on geothermal and how states can be partners on working more effectively to address the market de-risking technology and policy factors.

idahocapitalsun.com
Jun 14, 2026

It makes logical sense to specifically address unethical price gouging that targets a consumer with an unfair, significantly higher price.

coloradonewsline.com
Aug 6, 2026

When government owns part or all of private companies, government is no longer just setting the rules—it becomes a player in the game and sets the rules to its own advantage and against the people.

reason.com
Jul 2, 2026

The people inside of a government process should be able to speak publicly about it when the outcome raises serious questions of fairness and equal justice.

coloradonewsline.com

Other voices in this conversation