Will the Speaker understand that the Speaker is preventing H.R. 15 from coming to the floor, and that is why there are men and women in the gallery that potentially face deportation and their families are being torn apart. It is very simple, Madam Speaker. Very simple. We need an immigration system that reflects our values as Americans--a Nation of immigrants and a Nation of laws. One that creates jobs for Americans; one that reduces our deficit by over $200 billion; secures our border; prevents terrorists from entering our country so we know who is here; and ensures that crimes are reported. We can do that, Madam Speaker. And I have heard it said that perhaps some prefer to do it piecemeal. Let's see what the pieces are and let's have a meal. That is what the Thanksgiving spirit is all about. We will be happy to look at the pieces. Let's see them. In fact, the Judiciary Committee has reported out four bills. Those bills aren't perfect, by any means; but through the Rules Committee and the amendment process on the floor, I hope that we could potentially make them part of a bill. But those four bills have languished. In the meantime, other bills that have come through the Judiciary Committee, for instance, an asbestos bill, found a fast track to the floor. Patent reform, fast track to the floor. Four immigration bills passed out of committee. Weeks go by, months ago by, and nobody hears a thing. Why aren't we considering those bills, Madam Speaker?…
Share
More from Jared Polis
This bill doesn’t apply to any other context besides civil immigration enforcement — including rights violations in protests, elections, prisons, or the workplace.
In the wake of (last year’s) veto and the substantial negotiations that preceded it, I would have hoped that both business and labor leaders could have worked to craft a long-term and durable agreement on this matter that would have served…
The issue is really whether her free speech - her incorrect and, you know, free speech around election conspiracy theories - was held against her in sentencing.
When government owns part or all of private companies, government is no longer just setting the rules—it becomes a player in the game and sets the rules to its own advantage and against the people.





