On the recordNovember 3, 2011
I want my friend from New York to catch her breath. That's why I'm going to claim time in opposition. But I also do have a question. In 2008 when the stock market crashed, when we saw home prices drop like a rock, when people lost their jobs, we experienced over a several month period deflation--not inflation; deflation. Under the amendments, both the preceding one as well as the amendment by my friend from Arizona, when I look at it, I think, if the price goes down, this could also shrink. I yield to my friend North Carolina. Mr. McHENRY. I thank my colleague for bringing this up, and it is a great concern. I didn't have the opportunity to say, I do, in fact, support the gentleman's amendment. I appreciate him offering it. It's a very thoughtful amendment. I believe, looking at this, when you have it on an annualized basis, that does actually allay some of those concerns. But I think you and I agree that when we don't address some of these securities laws as frequently as we should to update with technology and what happens in the market, we should have in place these measures to ensure that Congress' intent is followed even 20 years from now and can keep pace with what is reasonable in the marketplace. I think that your concern is actually a very interesting one. And I would be happy to talk with the gentleman more about ways that we can update securities laws to deal with some of these struggles.





