On the recordJuly 15, 2014
I would just urge the Chair, in ruling, that this does not change the law in any respect. It respects the guidance that has been promulgated by the Justice Department and the Treasury Department and does not make a change and is not outside of the rules. I would say to my friend from Florida that his point of order is incorrect, and would ask the Chair to rule that the gentleman's amendment is in order. The Acting CHAIR. The Chair is prepared to rule. The Chair finds that this amendment includes language requiring a new determination as to the reason a financial institution provides financial services to an entity. The amendment, therefore, constitutes legislation in violation of clause 2 of rule XXI. The point of order is sustained, and the amendment is not in order. Amendment Offered by Mr. Walberg
