The timing of our discussion today is notable. In overturning Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court has substantially weakened the Constitutional right to privacy.
Ed Perlmutter: “The timing of our discussion today is notable. In overturning Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court has substantially weakened…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of Roe v. Wade on privacy rights.
Share
More from Ed Perlmutter
If there is anything that is built on trust, it is banking, and the banking sector lost a lot of trust in 2008.
For the purpose of debate only, I yield the customary 30 minutes to the gentlewoman from Minnesota (Mrs. Fischbach) pending which I yield myself such time as I may consume. During consideration of this resolution, all time yielded is for…
The reversal of Roe v. Wade, but they basically say that, under the United States Constitution, there is no such thing as a right to privacy.
I absolutely agree. I think we are up to 600, 700 pages of Ethics provisions... some things that are going to be needed, and there are going to be some things that... need to be cleaned up.





