On the recordAugust 1, 2013
The choice is clear. OSM's new proposal is unnecessary, unjustified, and dangerous, and certainly does not meet any cost-benefit standard.
Source
congress.govThe choice is clear. OSM's new proposal is unnecessary, unjustified, and dangerous, and certainly does not meet any cost-benefit standard.
Lamborn criticizes the proposed rule by OSM as harmful and without justification.
Share
More from Doug Lamborn
This rule, which the BLM finalized just 4 days ago, undermines the agency's statutory multiple-use mandate and limits access to Utah's public lands for energy and mineral development, grazing, forest management, and recreation.
H.R. 3173, which is being led by Congressman Amodei, reflects a sincere effort to balance competing needs and desires for economic development, public purposes, and conservation goals.
I would now like to ask Representative Rose from the great State of Tennessee to come and speak.