So, really, it seems to me--I don't want to be implying either that more regulations would save more money or fewer regulations would cost or save more money.
Diana DeGette: “So, really, it seems to me--I don't want to be implying either that more regulations would save more money or fewer…”
Editor's note · Context
DeGette discusses the need to evaluate regulations individually for cost-effectiveness.
Share
More from Diana DeGette
If I could pass Medicare-for-All unilaterally in the minority, I would do it, because I’m an original co-sponsor of that bill. But the frustration people are feeling is with the whole system.
I feel like my message is getting out to the voters: fighting against Donald Trump, fighting for Medicare For All, and against ICE, and that’s what they care about.
All of these radicals who are coming to the House, thinking they’re going to be able to pass a very broad bill like Medicare-for-All right away, they’re going to run into a brick wall immediately.
I have emphasized my efforts to fight Trump and his 'MAGA Republican' allies and protect access to abortion.





