On the recordMarch 26, 1996
Let me suggest that we take the words of James Madison as a benediction to this particular discussion, and just quoting from the last part of Federalist Paper No. 58, Madison on this very point wrote as follows: "It has been said that more than a majority ought to have been required in particular cases for a decision." That some advantages might have resulted from such a precaution cannot be denied. It might have been an additional shield to some particular interests and another obstacle, generally, to hasty and partial measures. But these considerations are outweighed by the inconveniences in the opposite scale. In all cases where justice or the general good might require new laws to be passed or active measures to be pushed, the fundamental principle of free government would be reversed. It would no longer be the majority that would rule. The power would be transferred to the minority. I do not think we should do that.
Source
govinfo.gov
