Mr. Chairman, many in the new majority seem determined to do anything they possibly can to interfere with a woman's privacy rights and freedom of choice about abortion. They even want to turn this bill into a battleground on that issue. This bill should be about defending the country, not making war on a woman's right to choose. Mr. Chairman, we will soon be taking up the DeLauro amendment, which would protect the rights of U.S. servicewomen abroad by allowing them to exercise the same constitutional rights available to women here at home. I ask my colleagues to support it. I ask them in the strongest possible terms. It is ironic, I think, that when we ask members of the U.S. Armed Forces serving abroad, women members of the Armed Forces to defend this country and its Constitution, we at the same time, if the language in the bill is retained, deny them the fundamental rights accorded every other woman in this society under the very Constitution they are being asked to defend. Of all people for us to single out, of all the people to deny the fundamental protections of the Constitution, rights to privacy and freedom of choice, we certainly should not be doing it to those women in uniform willing to risk their lives to defend this country and the rest of us. Mr. Chairman, I urge the majority in this body to leave these soldiers alone.
David Skaggs: “Mr. Chairman, many in the new majority seem determined to do anything they possibly can to interfere with a woman's…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing women's rights and abortion in relation to U.S. servicewomen during a floor debate.
Share
More from David Skaggs
this amendment makes a very small addition to the Marshals Service fund and deletes $9.4 million in funding for TV Marti for a very simple reason: It is a complete waste of money. I wish to amend the bill at this point in particular so…
Mr. Chairman, continuing, what this is really about on the merits is whether we want a country in which all Americans have access to fair employment treatment by their Federal Government. It is as simple as that. It is not about quotas…
But this really comes down to a pretty fundamental question, which is do you think the business of the United States courts, when involving the United States itself as a party, ought to be presumptively public business or not, yes or no…
Trying to regain my composure, and I thank the gentleman for interrupting me, perhaps just a couple of quantitative observations will capture how we are blessed and graced with the gentleman from Illinois being really an example of living…





