stated very simply, this amendment would exempt clean air laws and regulations from this bill. Without this exemption, the bill, I think, will hurt the environment and actually unwittingly promote a kind of socialism in this country, a fact that may come as a surprise to my colleagues. I am utterly astonished at this, I assume, unintended consequence of the bill. But it would certainly be one of its effects, which I will explain in a moment. Clean air laws can be an unfunded mandate, primarily when local or State governments own and operate major sources of pollution. Just like other entities and persons, they run power plants, they drive vehicles, and operate other sources of pollution. State and local governments own almost 600 electric utilities, which generate something like 4 million tons of air pollutants a year. They operate untold thousands of motor vehicles. In my area in Denver, for instance, the regional transportation system has over 800 buses, and no one should doubt that they can be a source of air pollution. When Congress or the EPA adopts a nationwide air pollution standard, it applies to all power plants or landfills or all vehicles. Such a standard would be considered an unfunded mandate on States and local governments under the bill that is now before us.
David Skaggs: “stated very simply, this amendment would exempt clean air laws and regulations from this bill. Without this exemption…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a bill on clean air laws and potential unfunded mandates.
Share
More from David Skaggs
recent reports of atrocities against Kosovo civilians by Serb security forces are certainly appalling. It is further evidence of President Milosevic's criminality in repressing ethnic Albanians. It is entirely understandable why many…
I guess I am in the awkward position of wanting to help love their amendment to death, to acknowledge how meritorious their claim is for additional resources but then say, as the chairman has, 'Not here.' Because the account that they…
I am saddened by the tone of antagonism and mistrust that is already starting to creep into the proceedings. Perhaps the flaws in this resolution do not equal a violation of fundamental fairness. Due process, of course, is different from…
I want to express my deep respect to the gentleman from California for bringing this before the House. I agree with him that we ought to face up to our constitutional responsibilities, and that would incline me to support him. I agree with…





