anyone needing evidence that the Republican Contract on America is a public health accident waiting to happen need only look at a recent study on the effects of air pollution. The news in the study, the most comprehensive ever, is that people who live in the most polluted areas are significantly more likely to die early from respiratory ailments and heart disease. Even here in the Washington area where the air is not that bad, air pollution is likely to steal a year of life from each person. With this information, in a rational world, one would expect the Government to be doing more to be dealing with the air pollution problem. But not under Republican rules. Why do I say that? Well, one of the provisions tucked in the bill that we are going to be debating today would prohibit the EPA from ensuring the inspection of cars in the areas with the most dangerous air pollution. Republicans want to throw out one of the most effective tools we have had in keeping cars from pumping poison into the air. For those who are not already gagging on the Republicans' so-called Contract With America, hold your breath.
David Skaggs: “anyone needing evidence that the Republican Contract on America is a public health accident waiting to happen need only…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the public health implications of the Republican Contract on America and air pollution.
Share
More from David Skaggs
Thank you very much, Barbara. I appreciate the opportunity to report on the Congress to Campus program. Although I have been affiliated with it for a long time, I want to recognize the co-chairs of the program who couldn't be with us this…
I am saddened by the tone of antagonism and mistrust that is already starting to creep into the proceedings. Perhaps the flaws in this resolution do not equal a violation of fundamental fairness. Due process, of course, is different from…
I figure I must have it about right if I am getting criticized from both sides on this. If the President would merely pledge that he would come to Congress for a vote before initiating offensive action against Iraq, should that again…
But this really comes down to a pretty fundamental question, which is do you think the business of the United States courts, when involving the United States itself as a party, ought to be presumptively public business or not, yes or no…





