But if the gentleman would yield further, we can assume, given the evolution of the science of air quality and air pollution, that at some point this Congress will consider in the future tightened standards, and that is really what we are speaking to, and I am talking prospectively. At that time in the future is the gentleman standing for the proposition that publicly owned utilities, vehicles, landfills, should have to adhere to a lesser standard than everyone else?
David Skaggs: “But if the gentleman would yield further, we can assume, given the evolution of the science of air quality and air…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing future air quality standards and their implications for publicly owned utilities.
Share
More from David Skaggs
I am not questioning the gentleman's sincerity about taking national security issues seriously. Far be it from that. Contrary to what the gentleman is suggesting, I think we should adhere to and aspire to a particularly high standard of…
But this really comes down to a pretty fundamental question, which is do you think the business of the United States courts, when involving the United States itself as a party, ought to be presumptively public business or not, yes or no…
Thank you, Mr. President, I appreciate your yielding the time, and I am proud to be able to report to our colleagues about the Congress to Campus Program activities for this past academic year, 2005-2006. As the gentleman from Missouri…
Mr. Chairman, there are a couple of points in the bill that we expect to get to in conference that I hoped I might be able to discuss with the chairman of the subcommittee. In particular the bill already includes, Mr. Chairman, as you…





