it is not that point, but the apparent internal inconsistency between the 75-percent cap and the other language in this legislation that prescribes funding levels for the Commerce Department in accordance with the earlier rejected conference report or the earlier vetoed conference report. In that conference report, for instance, the ATP program was funded at substantially lower levels than the 75 percent. I want to make sure the 75 percent controls.
David Skaggs: “it is not that point, but the apparent internal inconsistency between the 75-percent cap and the other language in this…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing inconsistencies in funding levels for the Commerce Department in legislation.
Share
More from David Skaggs
Mr. Speaker, of course we want to support American troops as they carry out this dangerous and important mission. But let us not lose sight of the sad fact that President Clinton has acted in violation of the Constitution in ordering these…
Mr. Chairman, there are a couple of points in the bill that we expect to get to in conference that I hoped I might be able to discuss with the chairman of the subcommittee. In particular the bill already includes, Mr. Chairman, as you…
as the country and this body battles to find some clarity in the back and forth between the salacious and the fallacious, there are actually some significant and important things going on in Washington and in Congress. One of those has to…
I understand there is some frustration on the other side about all of this. This resolution has been cleverly drafted to appear, at first reading, perhaps, even to be innocuous. But let me just suggest to my colleagues that we ought not to…





