Mr. Chairman, in closing my part of this, we are talking about a total budget here of $2.6 billion. We are talking about a .04 percent overall cut, $11 million out of $2.6 billion. I think for the future of our grandchildren, as has been stated, that sooner or later we are going to run out of fossils, we are going to run out of coal, we are going to run out of everything else, and this is good, clean energy that is being developed now at less and less a cost every year. This is not corporate welfare. Private industry is not going to go out and develop this when there is not a profit to be made. That is why we have to put the dollars in to find these good, clean, renewable sources. I would urge Members to support the Schaefer-Klug-Minge-Fazio, et al. amendment.
Daniel Schaefer: “Mr. Chairman, in closing my part of this, we are talking about a total budget here of $2.6 billion. We are talking about…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of funding for renewable energy sources during budget debate.
Share
More from Daniel Schaefer
in the years I have watched this body at work, I have concluded that only a constitutional amendment requiring a balanced Federal budget will force the consensus necessary for real deficit reduction. Opponents of the amendment are pressing…
H.R. 2967 reauthorizes the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act, the 1978 law which has been cleaning up the radioactive contamination created by uranium milling operations. The program has been a valuable and generally successful…
President Clinton may be content with a deficit of only $170 billion next year, but the taxpayers are not. To put Congress on the path toward a balanced budget, I have offered a substitute amendment to the budget resolution that orders…
I call it revolutionary, and if we started the revolution today, I am proud of it. It is going to take people all across this country joining us in this endeavor to get this Tax Code out of our hair once and for all and go to a very…





