Mr. Chairman, in closing my part of this, we are talking about a total budget here of $2.6 billion. We are talking about a .04 percent overall cut, $11 million out of $2.6 billion. I think for the future of our grandchildren, as has been stated, that sooner or later we are going to run out of fossils, we are going to run out of coal, we are going to run out of everything else, and this is good, clean energy that is being developed now at less and less a cost every year. This is not corporate welfare. Private industry is not going to go out and develop this when there is not a profit to be made. That is why we have to put the dollars in to find these good, clean, renewable sources. I would urge Members to support the Schaefer-Klug-Minge-Fazio, et al. amendment.
Daniel Schaefer: “Mr. Chairman, in closing my part of this, we are talking about a total budget here of $2.6 billion. We are talking about…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of funding for renewable energy sources during budget debate.
Share
More from Daniel Schaefer
Mr. Speaker, I would like specifically to address section 334 of the defense authorization conference report... I will introduce legislation next year to correct this.
H.R. 2630 as amended directs the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to extend the deadline for construction of a hydroelectric project in Illinois. This 78-megawatt project would be located at an existing Corps of Engineers dam on the…
I am also pleased to be an original cosponsor and encouraged that Congress has taken another step forward in fulfilling compliance by the Federal facilities in this country the same that private industry does.
This morning I rise in strong support of the contract version of the balanced budget amendment and that three-fifths vote requirement for tax increases. The Federal budget can and should be balanced through spending cuts and not through…





