this morning I rise in strong support of the contract version of the balanced budget amendment and that three-fifths vote requirement for tax increases. The Federal budget can and should be balanced through spending cuts and not through tax increases. That was the message of the voters last fall: Cut spending first. That preference for spending cuts even if only effective after the year 2002 should be embodied in the U.S. Constitution. I thank very much my friend from Texas [Mr. Barton] for his leadership on this particular issue. We have worked long and hard on this. I encourage each and every one of my colleagues to support the Barton substitute. My colleagues, let us do this for our children and for our grandchildren. Vote for the Barton amendment.
Daniel Schaefer: “this morning I rise in strong support of the contract version of the balanced budget amendment and that three-fifths…”
Editor's note · Context
Supporting the balanced budget amendment and advocating for spending cuts over tax increases.
Share
More from Daniel Schaefer
This plan will bring some commonsense to our country's product liability laws. Sadly, frivolous litigation has become a fact of American life. Too often, bringing people to court has taken the place of personal responsibility. People treat…
I have long supported a balanced budget amendment, because I believe that, unless we control the deficit, our Nation will soon face a fiscal crisis of unimaginable proportions. The Clinton administration has recently been crowing because…
these bills extend the deadline for construction of hydroelectric projects in the States of Illinois, Kentucky, North Carolina, Ohio, and Pennsylvania. Under section 13 of the Federal Power Act, project construction must begin within 4…
today I rise in strong support of the Barton-Tauzin balanced budget amendment. I support this amendment because not only does it required a balanced budget, but it puts Congress on the correct path toward achieving one. The Barton-Tauzin…





