What is the justification for that?

We are no longer looking at cost-benefit analysis of which projects make economic sense and which do not.

My concern is that there is such a huge amount of water coming in.

Does that include the $116 million in economic development projects for Sunrise Ski Park, among other things?

That comes to a mind-numbing figure of 2.1 million gallons per resident per year.

It seems to me that goes far beyond anything contemplated in the Winters decision.

The more abundant the water supply, the cheaper it will be.

The estimated cost for our facility would basically be capital costs, about $7,000 an acre-foot.

$7,000, I think that amount seems astronomical.

When something is scarce, it becomes expensive. When it is plentiful, it is cheap.

We have five districts here that want to get into a relationship with the Federal government. We have one here that has been in such a relationship and wants to get out because of all the regulatory burdens and costs that are associated.