Right, so, again, it gets back to a very simple question--if we can't store it as snow, we have to store it as water, or we lose it.
shouldn't we be focusing on the least expensive sources of water before we put money into the most expensive?
The southern portion of the United States and the southern portion of the Southwest clearly are looking at hotter and drier conditions.
For every dollar that the salmon industry produces, agriculture generates $568.
Your father thought it made sense; he is the one who authored the 1980 legislation authorizing the expansion of Shasta.
If we can't store it as snow, doesn't that mean we need to store it as water?
What is better, abundance or scarcity?
The climate is constantly changing, which requires constant adaptation.
It's important that this Subcommittee soberly assess and plan for these challenges.
One policy option that we'll all hopefully agree on is the need to invest in our water infrastructure.
And I'm hopeful that this Subcommittee can work together to disprove that old notion that 'water is for fighting over,' and instead work to ...