Madam Chairman, the language in section 425 simply maintains the status quo regarding the definition of fill material for purposes of the Clean Water Act. The existing definition was put in place through a rulemaking initiated by the Clinton administration and finalized by the Bush administration. That rule harmonized the definition on the books of the Corps and EPA so both agencies were working within the same definition. Any attempts to redefine this important definition could significantly negatively impact the ability of all earthmoving industries--road and highway construction and private and commercial enterprise--to obtain vital CWA section 404 permits. Changing the definition of fill material could result in the loss of up to 375,000 high-paying mining jobs and jeopardize over 1 million jobs that are dependent upon the economic output generated by these operations. For these reasons, I support the underlying language and oppose the amendment. Madam Chairman, I reserve the balance of my time.
Share & report
More from Ken Calvert
Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may have 5 legislative days to revise and extend their remarks and submit extraneous materials. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the gentleman from…
But I think there has got to be a better way to do this, because what we have been doing hasn't been working.
Mr. Speaker, the House was excluded from all negotiations regarding the Senate supplemental, and today we are talking about assistance to Israel that is needed immediately. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1\1/2\ minutes to the gentleman from North…
Mr. Speaker, the folks that believe in genocide is Hamas. Mr. Speaker, I yield 2\1/2\ minutes to the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Diaz-Balart), the Chairman of the State and Foreign Operations Subcommittee.





