The base bill actually creates all kinds of uncertainty, and allows a ski area owner to sell their water rights. If you are a local business owner in that area who depends on the ski resort business, let's say you own a restaurant or an equipment store or have a hotel, H.R. 3189 means that you have no idea, from one year to the next, whether the resort, which brings people to town, will still be operating if it has water. If the water rights are not tied to the resort in any way, which is what H.R. 3189 wants to ensure, there is no guarantee that the owners won't sell the water, leaving the Forest Service holding a ski resort that cannot operate without that water because the water rights have been previously sold. It is the Forest Service that is trying to create some minimal certainty that the resort would have current water rights to keep running, even if the current owners were to leave. It is H.R. 3189 that is trying to prevent that certainty. Madam Chair, I reserve the balance of my time.
Grace Napolitano: “The base bill actually creates all kinds of uncertainty, and allows a ski area owner to sell their water rights. If you…”
On the recordMarch 13, 2014
Share
More from Grace Napolitano
Mar 21, 2024
The Clean Water Act was specifically enacted as a Federal-State partnership. Today, EPA has approved 47 States to implement the point source discharge program under section 402 of the Clean Water Act. Their status as coregulators makes…
Sep 10, 2024
Each day that passes absent clarity by the Federal government on Sackett compliance is one more day that business and the environment are at risk.
Sep 10, 2024
In my view, we get lost on questions of who is best suited to protect our water resources, rather than talking about the importance of rivers, streams, lakes and wetlands for current and future needs.
Sep 10, 2024
I believe this bill will restore the minimum levels of protections struck down by the conservative Supreme Court.





