To me, it's because they want to protect the underlying questions which is, did the President have knowledge of what the Russians were doing? Was he seeking business deals while he was running for President? And did he obstruct and try and…

We want to find out if the President is financially compromised by the Russians through lending, you know, lending from Deutsche Bank and money laundering that the Russians may have engaged in.

I think he is intending to keep Michael Cohen from coming in. At this point, I think because we are waiting for the Mueller report, we're doing our own investigations with respect to obstruction of justice and collusion, I don't think we…

I don't, because he took two days of heat of people saying who would not be able to deny it if they were confronted with it.

I hope he does it because I don't think any person is above the law and you can't allow the President to dictate the term.

This evening, the question has shifted from whether the President is working with the Russians to what evidence exists that the President is not working with the Russians.

I don't trust Donald Trump to turn them over.

the urgent concern, Anderson, is that today as we speak our President is still working with the Russians.

We have no way to obtain the physical evidence now other than getting it from Donald Trump, someone who has been wholly uncooperative.

It was fishy then, the fact that he met one-on-one with Putin with only an interpreter in the room the way that he blamed the United States and took Putin's side at that press conference.

The urgent concern, Anderson, is that today as we speak our President is still working with the Russians.