I think he should be sidelined from having access to any classified information.

We have a situation here really with a rogue son-in-law of the president of the United States that nobody except perhaps the special prosecutor and perhaps the president of the United States knows really what the hell he has been up to.

Ms. Hicks told us that the White House had told her that she was not allowed to talk about anything that has happened since the Election Day.

I do believe -- I am skeptical. The President has been consistent in this investigation only in his obstructive behavior.

I trust the Department. I don't trust the President.

If these are political edits, then it is really incumbent upon Devin Nunes to follow the lead that he set last week when he asked his colleagues to unanimously support releasing this memo to the public.

The larger issue here is the rule of law, the idea that political leaders in a democracy do not go after the police when they're being investigated or use the police to investigate their opponents.

Just because the public knew, it's never been the practice to acknowledge the evidence that's out there.

The court should be aware of, you know, potential biases that witnesses have.

I believe the intent here is to try and undermine them and see them gone.

They are supposed to allow the judge, who is, you know, the independent branch of government, to have all the facts available so they can make in an unbiased way a determination as to whether probable cause has been met.