H.R. 3118, the Veterans' Health Care Eligibility Reform Act of 1996, is hopefully the first step toward overhauling the confusing eligibility requirements currently confronting our veterans. This bipartisan legislation will move the VA away from its expensive focus on inpatient care to a more accessible and cost effective primary and outpatient means of delivering health care. Eligibility reform has been the top priority of the Committee on Veterans' Affairs in the 104th Congress. We have worked very hard to make this bill as budget neutral as possible. The VA committee, as well as the Department of Veterans Affairs, believes the bill can be implemented without the need for additional funds. However, the Congressional Budget Office disagrees and estimates that if fully funded, H.R. 3118 would result in increased demand for VA health care. In order to further address CBO estimates and assure members of the Committee on Veterans' Affairs budget-neutral intent, we are adding provisions that will place a ceiling on authorized levels for VA health care for fiscal years 1997 and 1998.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Veterans' Health Care Eligibility Reform Act of 1996 and its implications for veterans' health care.
Share
More from Robert Stump
We are being shortchanged in this bill. We are getting back less than 10 percent of this for veterans' savings, and that is simply not fair to the veterans of this country.
I believe it would be better to investigate the feasibility of establishing perhaps another cemetery in Washington for the purpose of honoring Americans who have substantially contributed to the well-being of the Nation but who do not meet…
Mr. Speaker, the House-Senate agreement, which produced this legislation, includes provisions from several bills passed by the House during the 104th Congress. These bills are H.R. 1384, to allow VA employees to work outside the VA; H.R…
Mr. Speaker, there have been some Members that have expressed a desire to consider language that would still provide a waiver for Arlington, and we considered this at length in committee. I personally oppose such language and would like to…





