You told us on this species of conservation concern that it would be based on scientific evidence of risk, but if you read the document, the word science isn't there.

There are I think it is over 65 plans need to be revised.

And I am glad for the point because multiple means multiple.

That does not narrow the species that can be considered for viability.

But while these and other Forest Service policies are not perfect, they are also not part of a vast conspiracy to lock up Federal land.

The criticism today... appears to be that it favors preservation and conservation over other use.

Yes. That has been our experience.

I think it would be helpful.

Where those jobs will come from is not only the recreational activities that will continue to expand on the national forests but also from the restoration work.

If access means motorized access without limits, then Times Square should be a great hunting ground.

We need a new rule.