I think data collection is one of the things that we need to do promptly.

So, concrete plans of action were proposed or considered during these discussions? Or was it more of an open-ended kind of a discussion?

However, DOI's online press release states that the discussion occurred at Sacaton on June 11.

Annually, how many of the FBI-referred MMIW cases are prosecutable?

But I think your statement and the statement of the Ranking Member, and the bipartisan approach to accountability with regard to this issue, is enough said.

However, it still remains unclear how many of these discussions occurred.

If relocated, the BLM leadership will become out of touch and rendered ineffective and irrelevant.

In reality, given the lack of transparency, analysis, and consultation this appears to be nothing more than a poorly veiled attempt to dismantle a Federal agency.

Absent a compelling showing of why this reorganization is needed and how it will advance the BLM's capacity to steward the National System of Public Lands for the benefit of all Americans, it seems increasingly clear that the…

The BLM, the resources it manages, and the people it serves are important, and the agency definitely deserves a national headquarters in our Nation's Capital.

If not rescinded or modified into a workable proposal, the BLM will be sidelined from any influence in national public lands policy within the beltway.