the amendment is very straightforward. It applies to the Office of Administration and the White House itself. However, in the unanimous-consent request, it simply stipulates that it must relate to the White House Travel Office which is a subcategory of the Office of Administration. What I am trying to accomplish, I am trying not to be redundant. Since there is already a proposal within the legislation itself to compensate the Travelgate victims, I am simply reducing the amount from the Office of Administration and the White House. They have full purview to go to the Office of Travel and take the money from there if they so desire. I see no inconsistency with the unanimous-consent request.
Matt Salmon: “the amendment is very straightforward. It applies to the Office of Administration and the White House itself. However…”
On the recordJuly 17, 1996
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment related to the White House Travel Office and compensation for Travelgate victims.
Share
More from Matt Salmon
Dec 5, 2016
I think it would be really tragic, really tragic, if we are not able to get the Indian Government to rethink this whole process in the name of the children.
Jul 11, 2016
I can't even contemplate why on God's green earth we even thought for a nanosecond about the F-16 sale.
Jul 5, 2016
It is time for the people of Cambodia to have their freedom and to cast off this corrupt regime that steals their property and enriches a small clique of Hun Sen cronies.
May 11, 2016
Thanks for holding this important hearing on tax legislation. As the Committee knows well, tax policy affects just about every part of American life.





