On the recordAugust 28, 2026
The 9th Circuit clearly explained in its ruling in the Nevada case that the federal law regulating commodities was never intended to strip states of their traditional police power over gambling.
Source
azmirror.comThe 9th Circuit clearly explained in its ruling in the Nevada case that the federal law regulating commodities was never intended to strip states of their traditional police power over gambling.
Discussing the implications of the court's decision.
Share
More from Kris Mayes
Kalshi’s position would have effectively federalized sports betting regulation nationwide and swept aside decades of state and tribal oversight built to protect consumers from the real harms of unregulated gambling.
We created this unit last year because families across Arizona have been waiting years, sometimes decades for answers that they deserve.