I want to reassure my colleague from Utah that our amendment does not eliminate the Woodrow Wilson Center. It is not our intention to eliminate the Woodrow Wilson Center. And nothing in it does eliminate the Woodrow Wilson Center. The majority of its funds come from the private sector. One could argue that removing this $4.8 million would have a significant impact upon the Woodrow Wilson Center, but several times in the presentation you talked about eliminating it. I just want the record to be clear that our amendment does not do that.
On the recordSeptember 18, 1997
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about an amendment's impact on the Woodrow Wilson Center during Senate debate.
Share
More from Jon Kyl
Dec 19, 2018
the other thing I would like to do this afternoon is to very briefly report to my colleagues and to constituents back home on some things which my predecessor, Senator McCain, was working on at the time of his untimely death and which his…
Nov 14, 2023
The first thing we've got to do is have a conventional capability which is so dominant that no party would ever consider a nuclear attack against the United States.
Nov 14, 2023
the United States allowed our nuclear enterprise to atrophy, both the weapons and the delivery systems
Nov 14, 2023
There is no question that in the next conflict, if there be one, space will be a critical aspect of that conflict.





