Let me finish making this point. Because what we are talking about with the backlog requires two points of clarification. One, that backlog will be cleared up; those people will get their legal status eventually and, in the meantime, as my colleague points out, they are here already, they are already unified, they are not suffering apart from each other. Second, it is important to note that the Simpson amendment grandfathers all of those people who came, I believe it is before May 1988--the exact date Senator Simpson can clarify--so that we are really not talking about in any real numbers creating a hardship for those adult children who would want to be reunified under the third priority.
Jon Kyl: “Let me finish making this point. Because what we are talking about with the backlog requires two points of…”
On the recordApril 25, 1996
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the backlog of legal status applications and the implications of the Simpson amendment.
Share
More from Jon Kyl
Nov 14, 2023
the United States allowed our nuclear enterprise to atrophy, both the weapons and the delivery systems
Nov 14, 2023
we're obviously not starting anything, we're playing catch up, and it's going to be a pretty tough job to catch up
Nov 26, 2018
I am concerned that the President continues to make statements and pursue actions that have undercut America's leadership position in the world.
Nov 27, 2018
today, along with several other colleagues from the Senate, I wrote to the President on the subject of the possible extension of the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty, or New START. Several people have been encouraging the President to…





