Political Quotes

Jon Kyl: This letter presents the views of the Department of Justice on S. 185, the ``Habeas Corpus Restoration Act of 2007,'' as…

On the recordSeptember 17, 2007
This letter presents the views of the Department of Justice on S. 185, the ``Habeas Corpus Restoration Act of 2007,'' as introduced in the U.S. Senate. If enacted, S. 185 would remove the habeas corpus restrictions included in the ``Military Commissions Act of 2006.'' After a full and open debate, a bipartisan majority of Congress passed the MCA just last fall. The MCA's restrictions on habeas corpus codified important and constitutional limits on captured enemies' access to our courts. The DC Circuit upheld MCA's habeas restrictions in--the name of the case is Boumediene v. Bush--I will omit the citation--decided in 2007. The provision of S. 185 that seeks to remove these important limits ignores their history and their role in protecting our Nation's security. As the Supreme Court recognized in Johnson v. Eisentrager, a 1950 case, the extension of habeas corpus to alien combatants captured abroad ``would hamper the war effort and bring aid and comfort to the enemy,'' and the Constitution requires no such thing.
Said by
Jon Kyl
Republican · Arizona

Editor's note · Context

Discussing the implications of the Habeas Corpus Restoration Act of 2007.

Share

More from Jon Kyl

Oct 5, 2018

I know that the Democratic leader is scheduled to speak next, but if there is a minute that I could take in between, I just wanted to comment on my colleague who spoke yesterday, Senator Collins. I had wanted to come to the floor to speak…

govinfo.gov
Nov 14, 2023

we're obviously not starting anything, we're playing catch up, and it's going to be a pretty tough job to catch up

congress.gov
Nov 14, 2023

One of our recommendations concerns ways that we could potentially mitigate the risk of a deterrence gap.

congress.gov
Nov 14, 2023

Mr. Chairman, Representative Jacobs, the fact is that our current system has deteriorated and aged to the point that we wouldn't be confident in the deterrent value of it on out into the future.

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation